M3 Lee

Whether its tracked or wheeled, this is the place for it
OneSmallStep1966
Command Sergeant Major
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 935
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 2:37 pm
Location: Herne Bay, Kent (UK)
England

Re: M3 Lee

Post by OneSmallStep1966 »

The paint looks to have gone down very well, I wouldn't have known it hadn't been airbrushed unless you said.
privatepete
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
Posts: 3871
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:13 pm
England

Re: M3 Lee

Post by privatepete »

spock1701 wrote: Wed Apr 12, 2017 4:58 pm As I have always said, your painting is very good. Very smooth with no visible brush strokes. Looks easily as good as any airbrush.

Do you thin your paints at all? Or just use them straight out of the pot?
I only thin my Vallejo paints with De-ionised water, everything else straight out of the pot. :th:
privatepete
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
Posts: 3871
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:13 pm
England

Re: M3 Lee

Post by privatepete »

OneSmallStep1966 wrote: Wed Apr 12, 2017 5:08 pm The paint looks to have gone down very well, I wouldn't have known it hadn't been airbrushed unless you said.
Now now flattery will get you no-wear sir :lol: :lol:
User avatar
digger303
General
General
Posts: 16667
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 10:01 am
Location: Western Australia
Australia

Re: M3 Lee

Post by digger303 »

Terrific hand painted work and I agree with onesmallstep. I would have assumed it had been airbrushed.
Listen and appear wise
Image
Image

scalemates stash https://www.scalemates.com/profiles/mat ... ION[]=Kits
Image
privatepete
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
Posts: 3871
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:13 pm
England

Re: M3 Lee

Post by privatepete »

digger303 wrote: Thu Apr 13, 2017 12:49 am Terrific hand painted work and I agree with onesmallstep. I would have assumed it had been airbrushed.
Cheers Ian, looks like I might be heading in the right erection :)
privatepete
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
Posts: 3871
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:13 pm
England

Re: M3 Lee

Post by privatepete »

Got the main colour on

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

All my models are hand painted

Thank you for looking :cheers2:
privatepete
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
Posts: 3871
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:13 pm
England

Re: M3 Lee

Post by privatepete »

Got the detailed painting and tracks all done

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

All my models are hand painted

Thanks for looking :cheers2:
OneSmallStep1966
Command Sergeant Major
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 935
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 2:37 pm
Location: Herne Bay, Kent (UK)
England

Re: M3 Lee

Post by OneSmallStep1966 »

Top job Pete ๐Ÿ‘
privatepete
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
Posts: 3871
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:13 pm
England

Re: M3 Lee

Post by privatepete »

OneSmallStep1966 wrote: Mon Apr 17, 2017 7:22 pm Top job Pete ๐Ÿ‘
Thanks mate, but I'll be glad to see this one gone ! :cheers2:
User avatar
digger303
General
General
Posts: 16667
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 10:01 am
Location: Western Australia
Australia

Re: M3 Lee

Post by digger303 »

good job !
Is that the old Monogram kit from 1973. I suspect it is kit number 7850 in 1/32 .
Listen and appear wise
Image
Image

scalemates stash https://www.scalemates.com/profiles/mat ... ION[]=Kits
Image
privatepete
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
Posts: 3871
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:13 pm
England

Re: M3 Lee

Post by privatepete »

digger303 wrote: Tue Apr 18, 2017 5:45 am good job !
Is that the old Monogram kit from 1973. I suspect it is kit number 7850 in 1/32 .
Hi Ian, I've known idea but I've been told this .............
by DasAbteilung ยป Apr 5th, '17, 20:11

Is this a re-box of the old (1970's) Monogram 1/32 Lee?? Revell have never done one of their own, and although they mould-share some Academy moulds this isn't the Academy kit.

This kit has the same track link mistake as the old Tamiya ones. The links are not actually connected together as the end connectors are moulded on each link, not between each link. If this is the old Monogram kit I think you might have trouble finding any after-market tracks to fit as the suspension will be slightly longer and wider in 1/32. Airfix 1/32 Lee or Grant tracks should fit, although I recall that the Grant had WE210 "Double I" tracks. These were occasionally seen on British Lees. I know you've started this now, but in 1/32 the Airfix kit is much better. In 1/35, Academy is really the one to have.

I like the British Lees fitted with mud chutes between the bogies and extra rear stowage boxes. I believe the MG cupola was removed and replaced with a split hatch. They might have had the longer gun and welded-up side door
Yes, this is indeed the old Monogram kit. So it dates back to the mid-70's. It's also 1/32, not 1/35. You've given yourself a lot of extra work with this one: a challenge. None of the usual after-market parts, like the RB barrel, will be quite the right size: a bit too small. There are 1/32 0.30" barrels available from Master, and the old - but nice - Armour Accessories jerricans (you still see these on eBay) were always too big for 1/35.

Monogram and Tamiya had little choice about the track error because of the limitations in moulding capability back then. Tamiya's M3's are late 70's. They couldn't mould tracks just connected by the end connectors, they needed to connect the links themselves. Although the technology improved the moulds were never updated. You still get the duff tracks in the Tamiya Lee and Grant today: they could easily have slipped in the tracks from one of their later M4s. Clearly Revell haven't changed the old Monogram moulds either.

That track error is impossible to correct and I don't think 1/35 ones will fit: they might - but they ought to be too narrow for the wheels and sprockets and a couple of links too short. If you were to buy an Airfix kit for the tracks you might as well use the better kit too. But both Airfix M3's had the WE210 tracks, only appropriate to British use.

I wouldn't ever describe myself as a rivet counter, but the track error is fairly fundamental.
I hope this helps in some away, i just want it finish so I can hide under a rock and build quietly out of the way :(
User avatar
Stokesy44
Lieutenant General
Lieutenant General
Posts: 9093
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2015 10:13 am
Location: The Midlands, UK
Great Britain

Re: M3 Lee

Post by Stokesy44 »

I think it looks superb. The base coat and detail work is up to your usual high standards.

Cannot wait to see this beast come to life when you weather it mate :th:
Its been tried and tested, it works! So don't blame the system if you're no good. :doh:
User avatar
digger303
General
General
Posts: 16667
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 10:01 am
Location: Western Australia
Australia

Re: M3 Lee

Post by digger303 »

privatepete wrote: Tue Apr 18, 2017 6:20 am
digger303 wrote: Tue Apr 18, 2017 5:45 am good job !
Is that the old Monogram kit from 1973. I suspect it is kit number 7850 in 1/32 .
Hi Ian, I've known idea but I've been told this .............
by DasAbteilung ยป Apr 5th, '17, 20:11

Is this a re-box of the old (1970's) Monogram 1/32 Lee?? Revell have never done one of their own, and although they mould-share some Academy moulds this isn't the Academy kit.

This kit has the same track link mistake as the old Tamiya ones. The links are not actually connected together as the end connectors are moulded on each link, not between each link. If this is the old Monogram kit I think you might have trouble finding any after-market tracks to fit as the suspension will be slightly longer and wider in 1/32. Airfix 1/32 Lee or Grant tracks should fit, although I recall that the Grant had WE210 "Double I" tracks. These were occasionally seen on British Lees. I know you've started this now, but in 1/32 the Airfix kit is much better. In 1/35, Academy is really the one to have.

I like the British Lees fitted with mud chutes between the bogies and extra rear stowage boxes. I believe the MG cupola was removed and replaced with a split hatch. They might have had the longer gun and welded-up side door
Yes, this is indeed the old Monogram kit. So it dates back to the mid-70's. It's also 1/32, not 1/35. You've given yourself a lot of extra work with this one: a challenge. None of the usual after-market parts, like the RB barrel, will be quite the right size: a bit too small. There are 1/32 0.30" barrels available from Master, and the old - but nice - Armour Accessories jerricans (you still see these on eBay) were always too big for 1/35.

Monogram and Tamiya had little choice about the track error because of the limitations in moulding capability back then. Tamiya's M3's are late 70's. They couldn't mould tracks just connected by the end connectors, they needed to connect the links themselves. Although the technology improved the moulds were never updated. You still get the duff tracks in the Tamiya Lee and Grant today: they could easily have slipped in the tracks from one of their later M4s. Clearly Revell haven't changed the old Monogram moulds either.

That track error is impossible to correct and I don't think 1/35 ones will fit: they might - but they ought to be too narrow for the wheels and sprockets and a couple of links too short. If you were to buy an Airfix kit for the tracks you might as well use the better kit too. But both Airfix M3's had the WE210 tracks, only appropriate to British use.

I wouldn't ever describe myself as a rivet counter, but the track error is fairly fundamental.
I hope this helps in some away, i just want it finish so I can hide under a rock and build quietly out of the way :(
It does and I should have read it myself....Makes me think how well you have done. I have the academy kit and I know the version I have has suspension size problems. Which I will fix when I get around to it. :th:
Listen and appear wise
Image
Image

scalemates stash https://www.scalemates.com/profiles/mat ... ION[]=Kits
Image
privatepete
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
Posts: 3871
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:13 pm
England

Re: M3 Lee

Post by privatepete »

digger303 wrote: Wed Apr 19, 2017 5:29 am

It does and I should have read it myself....Makes me think how well you have done. I have the academy kit and I know the version I have has suspension size problems. Which I will fix when I get around to it. :th:

Good luck with it when you do build it, and I would call it "detailing work" now missing, adding or modification work if you don't want the the s**t I got ;)
User avatar
digger303
General
General
Posts: 16667
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 10:01 am
Location: Western Australia
Australia

Re: M3 Lee

Post by digger303 »

privatepete wrote: Wed Apr 19, 2017 5:41 am
digger303 wrote: Wed Apr 19, 2017 5:29 am

It does and I should have read it myself....Makes me think how well you have done. I have the academy kit and I know the version I have has suspension size problems. Which I will fix when I get around to it. :th:

Good luck with it when you do build it, and I would call it "detailing work" now missing, adding or modification work if you don't want the the s**t I got ;)
I was just going to either use some left over dragon parts or the tristar suspension kit, but point taken about the obsessed. :th: :cheers2:

Hope you get your Mojo sorted :thumb2:
Listen and appear wise
Image
Image

scalemates stash https://www.scalemates.com/profiles/mat ... ION[]=Kits
Image
privatepete
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
Posts: 3871
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:13 pm
England

Re: M3 Lee

Post by privatepete »

Hi I'm calling this one done, there still a lot of tidying up to be done, I'v lost all interest in this one so sorry it's a bit rushed.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image


Thank you for looking:cheers2:
Last edited by privatepete on Sat Apr 22, 2017 3:54 pm, edited 4 times in total.
User avatar
digger303
General
General
Posts: 16667
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 10:01 am
Location: Western Australia
Australia

Re: M3 Lee

Post by digger303 »

looks pretty good :bow:: :th: :cheers2:
Listen and appear wise
Image
Image

scalemates stash https://www.scalemates.com/profiles/mat ... ION[]=Kits
Image
privatepete
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
Posts: 3871
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:13 pm
England

Re: M3 Lee

Post by privatepete »

digger303 wrote: Thu Apr 20, 2017 11:40 am looks pretty good :bow:: :th: :cheers2:
Hi Ian it's done that all I can say, they say you lean from each build you do and I certainly did and it was not anything to do with model making :(
User avatar
digger303
General
General
Posts: 16667
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 10:01 am
Location: Western Australia
Australia

Re: M3 Lee

Post by digger303 »

privatepete wrote: Thu Apr 20, 2017 11:46 am
digger303 wrote: Thu Apr 20, 2017 11:40 am looks pretty good :bow:: :th: :cheers2:
Hi Ian it's done that all I can say, they say you lean from each build you do and I certainly did and it was not anything to do with model making :(
A stiff British upper lip and all that old chap. :th: What else can ya do but soldier on :cheers2:
Listen and appear wise
Image
Image

scalemates stash https://www.scalemates.com/profiles/mat ... ION[]=Kits
Image
OneSmallStep1966
Command Sergeant Major
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 935
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 2:37 pm
Location: Herne Bay, Kent (UK)
England

Re: M3 Lee

Post by OneSmallStep1966 »

Looks good to me mate ๐Ÿ‘
privatepete
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
Posts: 3871
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:13 pm
England

Re: M3 Lee

Post by privatepete »

OneSmallStep1966 wrote: Thu Apr 20, 2017 9:07 pm Looks good to me mate ๐Ÿ‘
Hi i'v already removed all the weathering, i'll redo it one day :cheers2:
Post Reply

Return to โ€œArmour & Military Vehiclesโ€