Re: Stokesy's 1/35 RFM Sherman Firefly
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2020 9:35 pm
Man! The olive drab really came out nicely!
Scale Model & Modelling Forum
https://dev.globalscalemodeller.com/









Fantastic result to date, lovely clean paint job.Stokesy44 wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:50 am Detail painting done and decals on. Forgot to paint the muzzle of the co-ax MG![]()
Very pleased with the decals. They've got a beautiful matt sheen to them and minimal carrier film - why cant all decals be like this?
The travel lock for the gun sits square over the rear deck cover so I prized it off before painting as I knew the allied star would be going on there. I'll paint it and add it later.
There's quite a bit of variation in the paintwork. I know I went for the black / white base but its a bit more than I wanted. The matt varnish (to seal before filters) will calm it down as will the gloss varnish prior to the wash at the end.
That's where I am at close of business last night. Still happy with how its all going. I would recommend the kit to anyone who wants to build a Firefly and doesn't mind the detail work. To my mind its the best Firefly out there, especially when looked at from a cost / what's in the box basis. RFM are consistently well priced IMHO![]()
I've built a Tasca Sherman and I'd say the RFM is better. Better detail, better price. Major issue I had with the Tasca kit was the effect of the rubber band tracks on the sprung suspension. The bogeys looked great until I put the tracks on then the tension in the rubber bands squashed the front and rearmost wheels so the tank looked like a rocking horse. Had to superglue the suspension so it withstood the effect of the tracks. Kind of defeated the object.digger303 wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 11:27 am
How would you rate the RFM against Tasca assuming you have seen said kit. I know Tasca are expensive.
![]()
![]()
![]()
I'm seeing that too, and hardly any of the pics I've seen show the fender skirts either so I feel less bad about leaving them off nowKevthemodeller wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 2:00 pm Looking good mate, the decals really make a kit come alive![]()
Looking at pictures, most Firefly's didn't have painted barrels, if you look on Neil's Comet build thread, my friends didn't![]()
Thanks mate. High praise and good to hear. I have a couple Tasca'a to build sometime and I don't like the rubber tracks in any case and had thought to replace them. I had wondered why they charge so much for them and then stick horrible tracks in the kit. Bit like Dragon I guess.Stokesy44 wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 6:03 pmI've built a Tasca Sherman and I'd say the RFM is better. Better detail, better price. Major issue I had with the Tasca kit was the effect of the rubber band tracks on the sprung suspension. The bogeys looked great until I put the tracks on then the tension in the rubber bands squashed the front and rearmost wheels so the tank looked like a rocking horse. Had to superglue the suspension so it withstood the effect of the tracks. Kind of defeated the object.digger303 wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 11:27 am
How would you rate the RFM against Tasca assuming you have seen said kit. I know Tasca are expensive.
![]()
![]()
![]()
You cant get a Tasca for anywhere near the price of an RFM kit either.
My friend and a lot of other ex WW2 tankies I've spoken to over the years, said having skits in Normandy was a hindrance to maintenance, especially trying to fix broken tracks and they nearly always got ripped off/ badly damaged by going through hedge rows. If they didn't fall off they took them offStokesy44 wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 6:05 pm hardly any of the pics I've seen show the fender skirts either so I feel less bad about leaving them off now![]()









I always paint the tools after they're on the kit. Seems like less hassle than painting them separately then gluing them onto an already painted surface.digger303 wrote: Sun Dec 06, 2020 11:36 am Love the look great weathering. How did you do your tools ?
![]()
![]()
![]()


Oops, my bad. The brackets and clips get painted when the base colour goes down. The metal bits of the tools are painted flat back (gun metal is too shiny) and the wooden elements are painted in tan. They get all dirtied up when the wash goes down and that's pretty much it.digger303 wrote: Mon Dec 07, 2020 2:36 pm Sorry Stokesy I didn't structure my question correctly. I meant to ask what were the color /washes and steps used to paint your tools.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Stokesy44 wrote: Mon Dec 07, 2020 6:40 pmOops, my bad. The brackets and clips get painted when the base colour goes down. The metal bits of the tools are painted flat back (gun metal is too shiny) and the wooden elements are painted in tan. They get all dirtied up when the wash goes down and that's pretty much it.digger303 wrote: Mon Dec 07, 2020 2:36 pm Sorry Stokesy I didn't structure my question correctly. I meant to ask what were the color /washes and steps used to paint your tools.
![]()
![]()
![]()
To be honest I was surprised how much the gloss knocked the oils back. I've just finished the build and will post shortly. Thankfully the final matt coat had the same effect - but in reverseTomcat64 wrote: Fri Dec 11, 2020 11:38 am Nice work on the weathering as always mate - it's always a surprise how the change in top coat changes the way everything looks!













