Sub-Assembly vs. Complete Assembly

General Modelling discusion that doesn't fit into any of the other sections
Post Reply
User avatar
NovYank
Sergeant First Class
Sergeant First Class
Posts: 331
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 5:40 pm
Location: New York

Sub-Assembly vs. Complete Assembly

Post by NovYank »

I'm curious to see the methods that other modelers use to complete there builds.

Clarifications if anyone needs them:

Sub-Assembly is when you build parts of your kit and then, after paint, you put the pieces back together.

Complete Assembly is where a modeler builds the entire kit according to the instructions, and then paints the kit.

There is also a mix of the two...

If you have a different way of finishing your kits that I don't know about be sure to let us know!!!

I guess I'll go first, if nobody has any objections, no, alrighty then. I'm more fond of sub-assembly. This is due to the fact that I'm not yet that skilled with a brush and a spray can to do the entire kit at once. I can't wait to hear how others complete their kits!!!
Proper Preparation Prevents Poor Performance
HobbyModeller
Sergeant First Class
Sergeant First Class
Posts: 332
Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 4:47 pm

Re: Sub-Assembly vs. Complete Assembly

Post by HobbyModeller »

I prefer sub assembly for two reasons - I brush paint so painting large surfaces is difficult without showing stroke marks and secondly a lot of kits have little pieces tucked away which you can't get to after complete assembly, at least with a brush. So I prefer sub assembly because it generally gets me a better finish :) With some things though like wings I usually only paint those once attached to the fuselage to make camouflage easier
User avatar
Gav0909
Chief Warrant Officer 5
Chief Warrant Officer 5
Posts: 2927
Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 11:56 am
Location: Fife, Scotland
Contact:

Re: Sub-Assembly vs. Complete Assembly

Post by Gav0909 »

I will assemble my kit to the point where further assembly would cause issues with getting it all painted. So for planes I tend to build up the cockpit parts, and then paint those, as well as painting the insides of the fuselage halves where the cockpit will go, as well as wheel wells etc. I then continue to build the kit as the rest can be painted whole, with masking of already painted parts.

For vehicles most of the time you should be able to assemble most of the kit and still be able to paint it all. Most armour modellers will leave the road wheels etc off though so that you can ensure you are painting behind them etc. The same for any large obtrusive bits of stowage etc.
User avatar
Lysion
Sergeant
Sergeant
Posts: 136
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 10:32 am
Location: Sweden

Re: Sub-Assembly vs. Complete Assembly

Post by Lysion »

I build mostly aircraft. And I build it in sub-assemblies as long as it is possible. Cockpit first since you usually need to enclose it inside the aircraft when gluing the fuselage halves together. Then the next sub-assembly is usually the landing gear and wheels which I paint and then install after the aircraft has been painted.
User avatar
Andy
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:12 pm
Location: Wellington, FL. USA

Re: Sub-Assembly vs. Complete Assembly

Post by Andy »

I build a lot of cars and I prefer building in sub-assemblies. I'll build up the whole chassis before painting, then move on to the interior, which I build completely before painting, etc.

I used to paint each and every part on the sprue before even assembling when I was younger. This produced a very sloppy finish haha
User avatar
Tiger131
Chief Warrant Officer 2
Chief Warrant Officer 2
Posts: 1701
Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 3:44 pm
Location: walsall
England

Re: Sub-Assembly vs. Complete Assembly

Post by Tiger131 »

full for me
Image
User avatar
McLeod
Master Sergeant
Master Sergeant
Posts: 422
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2013 4:59 pm
Location: Kent, UK

Re: Sub-Assembly vs. Complete Assembly

Post by McLeod »

I mostly do armour and military vehicles and usually build the whole thing but leave the wheels and tracks off to make painting easier. Sometimes with extra details like tow cables, machine guns and bits like that I'll do as sub assemblies and add on at the end.
There can be only one!
Unless your building two, or three, or four - ah to hell with it.

My Youtube Channel
User avatar
T3hGuppy
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
Posts: 3467
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 11:20 pm
Location: Bournemouth, UK
Contact:
Great Britain

Re: Sub-Assembly vs. Complete Assembly

Post by T3hGuppy »

I do a mix of the both depends on the subject and kit.
On the bench

Too much to list. !!


Youtube channel:https://www.youtube.com/user/bnealuk
WebbyNZ
Master Sergeant
Master Sergeant
Posts: 393
Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 11:02 am
Location: Manawatu, New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Sub-Assembly vs. Complete Assembly

Post by WebbyNZ »

I agree with the depends and mixture comments.
I try to build larger parts that will be painted together engine blocks etc in cars, bodies of bikes and then add the smaller detial/connecting parts as required.
I really wanna try a tank or something as I like the videos ive seen where it is build, paint, detial, weather, display.
Stand aside caffine, this is a job for alcohol.
Post Reply

Return to “Modelling Chat”