The Barkas Build

A more specific group build
Post Reply
User avatar
TexasAndy
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 77
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2013 9:01 pm
Location: Ft. Worth, TX

The Barkas Build

Post by TexasAndy »

[youtube]-QGqS0_dfNA[/youtube]
"That sounds like a constantly repeating repetitive redundancy"

Please check out my YouTube channel:

http://www.youtube.com/user/TacticalJac ... ture=watch
User avatar
schweinhund227
Chief Warrant Officer 4
Chief Warrant Officer 4
Posts: 2627
Joined: Fri May 24, 2013 9:51 pm
Location: Ontario,Canada
Contact:
Canada

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by schweinhund227 »

:banana: :cheers2: :pop:
User avatar
HamilkarBarkas
Chief Warrant Officer 2
Chief Warrant Officer 2
Posts: 1875
Joined: Fri May 31, 2013 3:12 pm
Location: "Augschburg" Augsburg/Germany

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by HamilkarBarkas »

schweinhund227 wrote::banana: :cheers2: :pop:
Panzer III´s are not your prefered thing, but i am happy to see that you will enjoy it anyway. I guess we all love to see nice models, no matter to which genre they belong to. :cheers2:
User avatar
TheTroyster
Command Sergeant Major
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 940
Joined: Fri May 01, 2015 7:12 pm
Location: Denver, Colorado

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by TheTroyster »

Why do you always make your cool group builds a You Tube or Google Plus only thing? Why not just make it a Non-ISM SIG build right here on this web site so more people can participate? :scratch::
Troy :violin:
User avatar
HamilkarBarkas
Chief Warrant Officer 2
Chief Warrant Officer 2
Posts: 1875
Joined: Fri May 31, 2013 3:12 pm
Location: "Augschburg" Augsburg/Germany

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by HamilkarBarkas »

Didn´t it say it can be done on YT and Google+ alike? And would that stop people from saying "oh no, now i have to sign up on either YouTube or ISM or both to take part in this?" I am not organizing this thing but certainly nothing stops you from sharing your stuff here, i do not see why it needs its own section on this forum. Just go ahead and do it :)
User avatar
Paul
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 12622
Joined: Thu May 23, 2013 4:47 pm
Location: Merseyside, England, UK
Contact:
England

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by Paul »

Lol ISM is good enough to advertise this though hey
User avatar
Les
First Sergeant
First Sergeant
Posts: 545
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 7:53 am
Location: Westminster, Colorado, United States

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by Les »

I have never built a panzer III, and I enjoy Hamilkar's videos! I will keep an eye out for the build section here on the forums. :-D
Image
User avatar
TexasAndy
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 77
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2013 9:01 pm
Location: Ft. Worth, TX

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by TexasAndy »

Paul wrote:Lol ISM is good enough to advertise this though hey

Fear not Paul I didn't discriminate I put it up on Armorama as well. I can take it down if you like if it concerns you.
"That sounds like a constantly repeating repetitive redundancy"

Please check out my YouTube channel:

http://www.youtube.com/user/TacticalJac ... ture=watch
User avatar
Paul
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 12622
Joined: Thu May 23, 2013 4:47 pm
Location: Merseyside, England, UK
Contact:
England

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by Paul »

TexasAndy wrote:
Paul wrote:Lol ISM is good enough to advertise this though hey

Fear not Paul I didn't discriminate I put it up on Armorama as well. I can take it down if you like if it concerns you.
It doesnt concern me, but its 12 months since you last posted on ism and your thread is about a build that people cannot even participate on Ism, bit cheeky if you ask me.
User avatar
HamilkarBarkas
Chief Warrant Officer 2
Chief Warrant Officer 2
Posts: 1875
Joined: Fri May 31, 2013 3:12 pm
Location: "Augschburg" Augsburg/Germany

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by HamilkarBarkas »

This:

Image

I actually think that having a SIG section here on ISM would not be a bad measure, it would make things more convenient for certain people. So if possible please create a section for this, it would be very much appreciated :th:
User avatar
felisbarcinonensis
Command Sergeant Major
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 860
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 9:42 pm
Location: BCN

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by felisbarcinonensis »

Andy!? Is that you!!? You look a lot like Michael!!!!! :shock:
User avatar
Paul
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 12622
Joined: Thu May 23, 2013 4:47 pm
Location: Merseyside, England, UK
Contact:
England

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by Paul »

HamilkarBarkas wrote:This:

Image

I actually think that having a SIG section here on ISM would not be a bad measure, it would make things more convenient for certain people. So if possible please create a section for this, it would be very much appreciated :th:
Yep i agree and stopping people taking part and leaving ISM members out of it is what i had a problem with, I'm sure you understand.

Let me know what numbers are interested in taking part from your side and if theres enough we will open a section for you :thumb2: :banana: :banana:
User avatar
HamilkarBarkas
Chief Warrant Officer 2
Chief Warrant Officer 2
Posts: 1875
Joined: Fri May 31, 2013 3:12 pm
Location: "Augschburg" Augsburg/Germany

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by HamilkarBarkas »

Thats very generous. i´d like to ask the fellow modellers on this site to come forward, because the Panzer III SIG section will primarily for them.
User avatar
TheTroyster
Command Sergeant Major
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 940
Joined: Fri May 01, 2015 7:12 pm
Location: Denver, Colorado

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by TheTroyster »

Oh I'd love to do this build. I've built a grand total of One German WWII Armor.

Correction: Two
Troy :violin:
User avatar
TexasAndy
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 77
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2013 9:01 pm
Location: Ft. Worth, TX

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by TexasAndy »

Paul wrote:
TexasAndy wrote:
Paul wrote:Lol ISM is good enough to advertise this though hey

Fear not Paul I didn't discriminate I put it up on Armorama as well. I can take it down if you like if it concerns you.
It doesnt concern me, but its 12 months since you last posted on ism and your thread is about a build that people cannot even participate on Ism, bit cheeky if you ask me.

I don't participate actively an any online forums Paul only on Facebook or Google +. Please pull the posting down if my inactivity bothers you. In all sincerity there will be no hard feelings.
"That sounds like a constantly repeating repetitive redundancy"

Please check out my YouTube channel:

http://www.youtube.com/user/TacticalJac ... ture=watch
User avatar
InitialProduction1
Sergeant Major
Sergeant Major
Posts: 727
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2015 4:49 pm

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by InitialProduction1 »

Awesome! I have a Dragon Pz III L, just hope it can stand up, when can we start?
On the bench
Sturm boot dragon,PZIII ausf J dragon, jagtiger old dragon, initial tiger dragon, tiger rye field,
Life is way to short to Dislike art so don't, help don't hate. :think:

clay
User avatar
HamilkarBarkas
Chief Warrant Officer 2
Chief Warrant Officer 2
Posts: 1875
Joined: Fri May 31, 2013 3:12 pm
Location: "Augschburg" Augsburg/Germany

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by HamilkarBarkas »

InitialProduction1 wrote:Awesome! I have a Dragon Pz III L, just hope it can stand up, when can we start?
Immediately or whenever it suits you, i do not see any reason to wait :) Everyone should go in his own pace, no time pressure should be there.
User avatar
felisbarcinonensis
Command Sergeant Major
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 860
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 9:42 pm
Location: BCN

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by felisbarcinonensis »

:banana: It would be awesome to have the Barkas Build set as a SIG here on ISM! :banana:
I'm in with Dragon's Pzkpfw. III.Ausf.N (Afrika)
Last edited by felisbarcinonensis on Sat Apr 30, 2016 6:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
LordFarnswaller
Sergeant
Sergeant
Posts: 160
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 6:05 pm
Location: Bridgwater

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by LordFarnswaller »

In like a rubber chicken in a joke shop
On the beach:
Tamiya A10
IDF Shot Cenrurion
T80

youtube: lordfarnswaller
User avatar
mannloon
Command Sergeant Major
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 985
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:57 pm
Location: Madison, WI USA
Contact:

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by mannloon »

Having it represented here makes sense in ways. I initially heard about ISM from one of Michael's videos. I'm sure back then that was often the case for armor modelers.
On the bench:
Cyber-Hobby T-34 Under New Management
Cyber-Hobby Tiger I Kursk
Rye Field Tiger I w/ Interior
Academy T-34 with bed spring armor
User avatar
HamilkarBarkas
Chief Warrant Officer 2
Chief Warrant Officer 2
Posts: 1875
Joined: Fri May 31, 2013 3:12 pm
Location: "Augschburg" Augsburg/Germany

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by HamilkarBarkas »

So far we got on ISM the following fellows:

TexasAndy
Les
felisbarcinonensis
TheTroyster
InitialProduction1
LordFarnswaller
mannloon

and myself of course. How many participants are necessary to get the sig section?
User avatar
rodrant
Chief Warrant Officer 2
Chief Warrant Officer 2
Posts: 1774
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2014 9:22 pm
Location: Maia - Portugal
Portugal

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by rodrant »

Well I greatly admire very much Hamilkar videos , and I should have a Panzer IIIAusf N from Tamiya waiting to be built ...so why not to participate here :-)
Cheers ,
António

On the Bench
a lot of stuff right now :-)
User avatar
Dunhill2005
Sergeant Major of the Army
Sergeant Major of the Army
Posts: 1195
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2013 1:38 pm
Location: Wunstorf, Germany
Germany

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by Dunhill2005 »

I would also participate, if possible ... :hi:
User avatar
schweinhund227
Chief Warrant Officer 4
Chief Warrant Officer 4
Posts: 2627
Joined: Fri May 24, 2013 9:51 pm
Location: Ontario,Canada
Contact:
Canada

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by schweinhund227 »

HamilkarBarkas wrote:
schweinhund227 wrote::banana: :cheers2: :pop:
Panzer III´s are not your prefered thing, but i am happy to see that you will enjoy it anyway. I guess we all love to see nice models, no matter to which genre they belong to. :cheers2:

:bow:: :thumb2:
User avatar
SgtBones
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Fulda Germany
United States of America

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by SgtBones »

I am also in on this. Mostly active in the Google+ forum though, it's easier to keep track of stuff there.
On the table: RFM Tiger I, Amusing Hobbies Rutscher and Pz38D, USS Missouri, Graf Spee, Italeri VW 1303
User avatar
TheTroyster
Command Sergeant Major
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 940
Joined: Fri May 01, 2015 7:12 pm
Location: Denver, Colorado

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by TheTroyster »

Looks like Bronco Models has a new Panzerkampwagen III Ausf.A

Anyone pick this up yet? If so, how are the tracks?
Troy :violin:
User avatar
mannloon
Command Sergeant Major
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 985
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:57 pm
Location: Madison, WI USA
Contact:

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by mannloon »

TheTroyster wrote:Looks like Bronco Models has a new Panzerkampwagen III Ausf.A

Anyone pick this up yet? If so, how are the tracks?
Im reviewing it for Armorama, they look like modelkasten clones. Just briefly looked in the box though.
On the bench:
Cyber-Hobby T-34 Under New Management
Cyber-Hobby Tiger I Kursk
Rye Field Tiger I w/ Interior
Academy T-34 with bed spring armor
User avatar
TheTroyster
Command Sergeant Major
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 940
Joined: Fri May 01, 2015 7:12 pm
Location: Denver, Colorado

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by TheTroyster »

mannloon wrote:
TheTroyster wrote:Looks like Bronco Models has a new Panzerkampwagen III Ausf.A

Anyone pick this up yet? If so, how are the tracks?
Im reviewing it for Armorama, they look like modelkasten clones. Just briefly looked in the box though.

dude you must think I am some sort of "track" freak? Every question I have to you is always about the tracks - FYI I only ask because I am going to buy the kit and if it has those damn rubber band tracks then I need to get aftermarket tracks.
Troy :violin:
User avatar
Vleugelmoer
Sergeant Major of the Army
Sergeant Major of the Army
Posts: 1011
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 3:06 pm
Location: Geleen, Limburg, The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by Vleugelmoer »

It could be my stupidity or lack of political correctness but it is possible to post new treads in the SIG section on the forum. I did so by accident the other day trying to post my thread for the Pacific GB. You might get a reply or a PM from Schoof asking what its all about but if you explain it to Sebastian I don't think he will object. He like Paul might put the youtube or google + part to question but if ISM members can join in on the SIG a thread in the appropriate section seems to be the next logical step...
Damm the glue is getting to me :crazy:

On the Bench:

1:35 Italeri Jeep Follow Me Jeep for the PTO GB
1:32 Revell F-4 Phantom for the Phantom Freaks SIG
User avatar
Paul
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 12622
Joined: Thu May 23, 2013 4:47 pm
Location: Merseyside, England, UK
Contact:
England

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by Paul »

Vleugelmoer wrote:It could be my stupidity or lack of political correctness but it is possible to post new treads in the SIG section on the forum. I did so by accident the other day trying to post my thread for the Pacific GB. You might get a reply or a PM from Schoof asking what its all about but if you explain it to Sebastian I don't think he will object. He like Paul might put the youtube or google + part to question but if ISM members can join in on the SIG a thread in the appropriate section seems to be the next logical step...
If we get 20+ ism members that will post updates on the forum, we will set up a section, its not worth setting up a section otherwise and build updates can be posted in the appropriate build section instead. Ive got an upcoming buddy build and I'm not even going to bother with a sig section for that as it doesnt have enough participants to warrant it :cheers2:
User avatar
Vleugelmoer
Sergeant Major of the Army
Sergeant Major of the Army
Posts: 1011
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 3:06 pm
Location: Geleen, Limburg, The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by Vleugelmoer »

Paul wrote: If we get 20+ ism members that will post updates on the forum, we will set up a section, its not worth setting up a section otherwise and build updates can be posted in the appropriate build section instead. Ive got an upcoming buddy build and I'm not even going to bother with a sig section for that as it doesnt have enough participants to warrant it :cheers2:
Seems like an appropriate and reasonable number if you ask me. I personally don't build armour models. I also stand with my namesake in his decision on this topic. Let's face it the SIG and GB section on ISM is not meant to be a bulletinboard for all SIG's and GB's held and or hosted by other sites.

For now I'm off to bed as today's non modeling mammoth airbrush session has worn me out and want to be semi fresh for tomorrow's continuation of it.

Have a nice one

Paul
Damm the glue is getting to me :crazy:

On the Bench:

1:35 Italeri Jeep Follow Me Jeep for the PTO GB
1:32 Revell F-4 Phantom for the Phantom Freaks SIG
User avatar
mannloon
Command Sergeant Major
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 985
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:57 pm
Location: Madison, WI USA
Contact:

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by mannloon »

Vleugelmoer wrote:
Paul wrote: If we get 20+ ism members that will post updates on the forum, we will set up a section, its not worth setting up a section otherwise and build updates can be posted in the appropriate build section instead. Ive got an upcoming buddy build and I'm not even going to bother with a sig section for that as it doesnt have enough participants to warrant it :cheers2:
Seems like an appropriate and reasonable number if you ask me. I personally don't build armour models. I also stand with my namesake in his decision on this topic. Let's face it the SIG and GB section on ISM is not meant to be a bulletinboard for all SIG's and GB's held and or hosted by other sites.

For now I'm off to bed as today's non modeling mammoth airbrush session has worn me out and want to be semi fresh for tomorrow's continuation of it.

Have a nice one

Paul
I think you're missing the point. I believe Andy's intentions were to have more people hear about and take part in the build in honor of Michael, who is admittedly one of the largest influences most of us armor guys that make or watch videos have. I assumed there would be an extension or segment of ISM people doing their thing with the same goal in honor of the same guy. Not google+ guys coming here to post work they were already doing. That would be stupid. And if you don't mind me asking, if you don't build armor models why on earth are you commenting on this topic? You've only been on ISM for like a month, so maybe you should chill buddy.
On the bench:
Cyber-Hobby T-34 Under New Management
Cyber-Hobby Tiger I Kursk
Rye Field Tiger I w/ Interior
Academy T-34 with bed spring armor
User avatar
felisbarcinonensis
Command Sergeant Major
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 860
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 9:42 pm
Location: BCN

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by felisbarcinonensis »

Image

BAHHH!!!!!

(Ooops! Sorry I couldn't avoid it)
User avatar
HamilkarBarkas
Chief Warrant Officer 2
Chief Warrant Officer 2
Posts: 1875
Joined: Fri May 31, 2013 3:12 pm
Location: "Augschburg" Augsburg/Germany

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by HamilkarBarkas »

TheTroyster wrote:Looks like Bronco Models has a new Panzerkampwagen III Ausf.A

Anyone pick this up yet? If so, how are the tracks?
[youtube]vxFMTtNVAws[/youtube]
User avatar
HamilkarBarkas
Chief Warrant Officer 2
Chief Warrant Officer 2
Posts: 1875
Joined: Fri May 31, 2013 3:12 pm
Location: "Augschburg" Augsburg/Germany

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by HamilkarBarkas »

Paul wrote: If we get 20+ ism members that will post updates on the forum, we will set up a section, its not worth setting up a section otherwise and build updates can be posted in the appropriate build section instead. Ive got an upcoming buddy build and I'm not even going to bother with a sig section for that as it doesnt have enough participants to warrant it :cheers2:
HamilkarBarkas wrote:I am not organizing this thing but certainly nothing stops you from sharing your stuff here, i do not see why it needs its own section on this forum. Just go ahead and do it
Good, it seems like we agree on something. So we do it in the normal way with build threads in the "work in progress section" just as it was intended by me. I do not remember who brought up the hassle with the SIG, i probably should not have dared to asked that in the first place.
LordFarnswaller
Sergeant
Sergeant
Posts: 160
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 6:05 pm
Location: Bridgwater

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by LordFarnswaller »

This post need more cow bell
On the beach:
Tamiya A10
IDF Shot Cenrurion
T80

youtube: lordfarnswaller
User avatar
HamilkarBarkas
Chief Warrant Officer 2
Chief Warrant Officer 2
Posts: 1875
Joined: Fri May 31, 2013 3:12 pm
Location: "Augschburg" Augsburg/Germany

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by HamilkarBarkas »

LordFarnswaller wrote:This post need more cow bell
[youtube]689IonHg_oY[/youtube]
User avatar
Paul
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 12622
Joined: Thu May 23, 2013 4:47 pm
Location: Merseyside, England, UK
Contact:
England

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by Paul »

HamilkarBarkas wrote:
Paul wrote: If we get 20+ ism members that will post updates on the forum, we will set up a section, its not worth setting up a section otherwise and build updates can be posted in the appropriate build section instead. Ive got an upcoming buddy build and I'm not even going to bother with a sig section for that as it doesnt have enough participants to warrant it :cheers2:
HamilkarBarkas wrote:I am not organizing this thing but certainly nothing stops you from sharing your stuff here, i do not see why it needs its own section on this forum. Just go ahead and do it
Good, it seems like we agree on something. So we do it in the normal way with build threads in the "work in progress section" just as it was intended by me. I do not remember who brought up the hassle with the SIG, i probably should not have dared to asked that in the first place.
Theres no hassle with a sig, but its pointless setting one up when only maybe 3 -4 ism members will actually post on the forum. My original problem was i thought it cheeky to post on a forum (that OP doesnt even post on anymore) about a build you cant even take part in on ISM, I'm sur you can see my point.
User avatar
HamilkarBarkas
Chief Warrant Officer 2
Chief Warrant Officer 2
Posts: 1875
Joined: Fri May 31, 2013 3:12 pm
Location: "Augschburg" Augsburg/Germany

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by HamilkarBarkas »

Paul wrote:
Theres no hassle with a sig, but its pointless setting one up when only maybe 3 -4 ism members will actually post on the forum. My original problem was i thought it cheeky to post on a forum (that OP doesnt even post on anymore) about a build you cant even take part in on ISM, I'm sur you can see my point.
Yeah i know, but since guys in this very thread asked for a SIG i put the question forward to you in order to make it possible to take part in this group build on ISM, so no one gets excluded, which is the point you mind about it and now you decided against it, but you mind that it does not take place on ISM. Well, i can not compete with that absolutely logic point of view.
User avatar
Paul
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 12622
Joined: Thu May 23, 2013 4:47 pm
Location: Merseyside, England, UK
Contact:
England

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by Paul »

HamilkarBarkas wrote:
Paul wrote:
Theres no hassle with a sig, but its pointless setting one up when only maybe 3 -4 ism members will actually post on the forum. My original problem was i thought it cheeky to post on a forum (that OP doesnt even post on anymore) about a build you cant even take part in on ISM, I'm sur you can see my point.
Yeah i know, but since guys in this very thread asked for a SIG i put the question forward to you in order to make it possible to take part in this group build on ISM, so no one gets excluded, which is the point you mind about it and now you decided against it, but you mind that it does not take place on ISM. Well, i can not compete with that absolutely logic point of view.
No i said if you get the number needed it'll be set up, whats hard to understand about that, like i said I'm not setting up a dedicated section for 5 people to build in as its not worth it.

If your going to be argumentative about it, we can just forget the whole thing and you keep it to google etc and leave it of ism
User avatar
Lee
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 7322
Joined: Thu May 23, 2013 4:38 pm
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:
Great Britain

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by Lee »

Oh FFS people! Really...!!!???!!!

I've moved this thread to the relevant section.

Now, Instead of setting up a dedicated forum for the GB/SiG how about a dedicated "thread" as Michael suggested on the first page? Win/win in my humble opinion :th:

Let me know if everyone is in agreement and we can set up the thread, sticky it and Michael can post all about it and the rules/guidelines and timescales etc. With members posting their progress etc in smaller stages than they usually would. When the SiG is finished Michael or Andy can pull the reveal shots from here and include them in their reveal video.

Sound OK with everyone?
Where does all the bloody time go.....?

Owner of Ultimate Modelling Products
User avatar
HamilkarBarkas
Chief Warrant Officer 2
Chief Warrant Officer 2
Posts: 1875
Joined: Fri May 31, 2013 3:12 pm
Location: "Augschburg" Augsburg/Germany

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by HamilkarBarkas »

I am cool with that, afterall no one gets excluded and the content we create that way will be nice for fellow model builders and the site here alike.
Obviously i will post my building progess here as well as on Google+
Reveal video is obligatory of course.

Thanks Lee for sorting this mess!
User avatar
Lee
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 7322
Joined: Thu May 23, 2013 4:38 pm
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:
Great Britain

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by Lee »

HamilkarBarkas wrote:I am cool with that, afterall no one gets excluded and the content we create that way will be nice for fellow model builders and the site here alike.
Obviously i will post my building progess here as well as on Google+
Reveal video is obligatory of course.

Thanks Lee for sorting this mess!

Cool...

Let me know what you want on the first page, rules and timescales etc, and I'll set up the thread for you Michael :th:
Where does all the bloody time go.....?

Owner of Ultimate Modelling Products
OneSmallStep1966
Command Sergeant Major
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 935
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 2:37 pm
Location: Herne Bay, Kent (UK)
England

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by OneSmallStep1966 »

Is this SiG absolutely restricted to Panzer III chassis only? I really like this kit and this SiG would be the perfect excuse to buy it :whistle:
image.jpeg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
HamilkarBarkas
Chief Warrant Officer 2
Chief Warrant Officer 2
Posts: 1875
Joined: Fri May 31, 2013 3:12 pm
Location: "Augschburg" Augsburg/Germany

Re: The Barkas Build

Post by HamilkarBarkas »

OneSmallStep1966 wrote:Is this SiG absolutely restricted to Panzer III chassis only? I really like this kit and this SiG would be the perfect excuse to buy it :whistle:
it is i´m afraid. But get it anyway, because it is awesome :)
Post Reply

Return to “Special Interest Group Builds (SiGs)”