Airfix 1/48 Gloster Javelin FAW .9/9R

[Lee]

Been hankering for this kit ever since it was announced and today it is MINE....lol

Can't wait to get stuck into this

A little history....

Origins

In the aftermath of the Second World War, Britain identified the threat posed by the jet-powered strategic bomber and atomic weaponry, and thus placed a great emphasis on developing aerial supremacy through continuing to advance its fighter technology even following the end of conflict. Gloster Aircraft, having developed and produced the only Allied jet aircraft to be operational during the war, the Gloster Meteor, sought to take advantage of its expertise, and responded to a 1947 Air Ministry requirement for a high-performance night fighter under Air Ministry specification F.44/46. F.44/46 called for a two-seat night fighter that would intercept enemy aircraft at heights up to at least 40,000 feet, it would also have to reach a maximum speed of no less that 525 kts at this height and able to perform rapid ascents, it was expected to attain an altitude of 45,000 feet within ten minutes of engine ignition.[1]
Additional criteria given in the requirement included a minimum flight endurance of two hours, a take off distance of 1,500 yards, structural strength to support up to 4g manoeuvers at high speed, and for the aircraft to incorporate airborne interception radar, multi-channel VHF radio and various navigational aids. the aircraft would also be required to be economical to be produced at a rate of ten per month for an estimated total of 150 aircraft.[2] Gloster would produce several design proposals in hope of satisfying the requirement; one proposal drawn up in 1946, P.228, bore a striking similarity to the earlier Meteor, while the later-issued P.234 and P.238 of early 1947 had adopted many of the features that would be distinctive of the Javelin, including the large delta wing and tailplane.[3] The RAF requirements were subject to some changes, mainly in regards to radar equipment and armaments; Gloster also initiated some changes as further research was conducted into the aerodynamic properties of the then-new swept and delta wings, as well as solidifying around the new Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire turbojet engine.[4]

Prototypes

Gloster Javelin, probably a flight test aircraft, at Farnborough
On 13 April 1949, the Ministry of Supply issued instructions to two aircraft manufacturers, Gloster and de Havilland, to each construct four flight-worthy prototypes of their competing designs to meet the requirement, as well as one airframe for structural testing each. These prototype aircraft were the Gloster GA.5 and the de Havilland DH.110, the latter of which held the advantage of also being under consideration for the Royal Navy.[5] Development was considerably delayed through political cost-cutting measures, the number of prototypes being trimmed down to an unworkable level of two each before the decision was entirely reversed; this led to the unusual situation where the first production Javelin was actually completed prior to the prototype order being fulfilled.[6]
The first prototype was structurally completed in 1951; one unusual feature of the prototypes was the non-transparent canopies over the two-man cockpits, it had been believed that visibility was unnecessary and a hindrance to the observer's role, the only external view available was via small 'portholes'. Following a month of ground testing, on 26 November 1951, the first prototype conducted its first flight at Moreton Valence airfield.[7][8] Bill Waterton, Gloster's Chief Test Pilot, would later describe the Javelin as being "as easy to fly as an Anson".[9] Disaster had nearly struck during one test flight when the elevator surfaces had detached during mid-flight; despite the lack of control surfaces, Bill Waterton was able to land the aircraft. He would be awarded the George Medal for his actions to retrieve flight data from the burning aircraft.[10]
The second prototype (WD808) received a modified wing in 1953. After initial testing by Waterton, it was passed to another Gloster test pilot Peter Lawrence[N 1] for his opinion. On 11 June 1953, the aircraft crashed. Lawrence had ejected, but too late (at about 400 ft (120 m)), and was killed. The Javelin had experienced a "deep stall", the wing acting like an airbrake had killed forward motion and at the same time stopped airflow over the elevators, leaving them useless. Without elevator control, Lawrence would not have been able to regain control and the aircraft dropped from the sky.[11][12] A stall warning device was consequently specifically developed and implemented for the Javelin.[13]
The third prototype (WT827), and the first to be fitted with operational equipment, including radar, first flew on 7 March 1953.[12] The fourth WT827 was passed to the Aeroplane and Armament Experimental Establishment (A&AEE) for trials and the fifth prototype, WT836, made its first flight in July 1954.[14] On 4 July 1954, a prototype Javelin accidentally achieved supersonic speed during a test flight, the pilot having been distracted by an oxygen supply failure.[15]
Production and further development[edit]
The official production order for the Javelin was issued in mid-1953; as the Gloster Meteor was still being actively produced by Gloster, considerable elements of the Javelin were subcontracted out to other aviation companies owned by the Hawker Siddeley Group, such as Armstrong Whitworth.[16] While some delays were incurred, the Javelin's status as a "super priority" for production helped to minimise the time involved in producing each aircraft. On 22 July 1954, XA544, the first production aircraft, took flight at Hucclecote. Production would be assisted by a large order placed by the United States Air Force, purchasing a number of aircraft for the RAF as part of the Mutual Defense Aid Program at a price of £36.8 million.[16]
On 21 October 1954, a pilot attached to Gloster from RAE Farnborough was killed while flying Javelin XA546 after having entered what appeared to be an intentional spin.[16] On 8 December 1955, a service test pilot S/L that geezer from down the road[17] was testing XA561 for the A&AEE when the aircraft entered a flat spin during maneuvers, which the anti-spin parachute could not stop, and he ejected. Following this, a stall-warning device was developed for the Javelin.
By the end of 1956, the Javelin was up to a FAW 7 variant, which was the first to actually meet the specifications of the original Air Ministry requirement, and which was to become the definitive version of the aircraft (most of which were later altered to the FAW 9 standard). Indeed, the Javelin was evolving so quickly that deliveries of the FAW 8 began before FAW 7 production had ended. As a result, the final 80 FAW 7 aircraft went straight from the factory into storage, eventually flying after being re-manufactured as FAW 9s. A total of 427 Javelins were produced in all variants, plus seven prototypes. While there had been considerable interest from several NATO air forces, there would ultimately be no export orders for the Javelin.[18]


Design

Two U.S. Marine Corps officers disembarking a Javelin FAW.7 at RAF Duxford, 1959
The Javelin was the RAF's first purpose-built interceptor aircraft,[19] major aerodynamic features of the type include its adoption of the then-new delta wing and a large tailplane. Both the aircraft's fuel and armaments were housed in the delta wing while the engines and crew were contained within the fuselage,[20] The delta wing and tailplane combination had been deemed necessary by Gloster for effective maneuverability at high speed and for the aircraft to maintain controllability at low landing speeds.[21] In one instance during testing, when both elevators had been torn off by elevator flutter, the Javelin remained controllable in part due to the aerodynamic qualities of the large tailplane used.[22] Changes from the prototypes included alterations to the rear fuselage and lengthened engine jet exhausts to eliminate buffeting of the rudder by the jet efflux, and increased sweepback of the wing's leading edge to improve high speed handling.[23]
The Javelin was reportedly an easy aircraft to fly, it could fly without apparent hindrance in the event of a single engine failure.[24] The flight controls were fully power assisted, production aircraft adopted a hydraulic 'feel' system for the pilot.[25] The Javelin featured an infinitely-variable airbrake; the airbrake proved to be extremely responsive and effective, allowing pilots to conduct rapid descents and heavy braking manoeuvres, enabling equally-rapid landings to be performed.[26] The turnaround time between sorties was significantly shorter than with the preceding Gloster Meteor due to improved ground accessibility and engine ignition sequence.[27] Also unlike the Meteor, the Javelin was fitted with ejector seats at the introduction to service of the type.[28]
In spite of the aircraft's unorthodox aerodynamic features, the Javelin had a fairly conventional structure and materials used; being mainly composed of an aluminium alloy with limited use of steel edging.[29][30] The fuselage was composed of four sections, the nose (containing the radar radome), the front fuselage, centre fuselage, and rear fuselage; the nose and rear fuselage were removable for servicing and easy replacement. The engines were located either side of the centre fuselage section, the internal space in the centre containing the service bay that housed much of the aircraft's electrical, hydraulic, and avionics subsystems.[29] The engine air intakes were placed on the forward fuselage, running directly from beneath the cockpit rearwards into the delta wing.[29] Electricity was provided by a pair of 6000 watt, 24 volt generators driven by the auxiliary gearbox; inverters provided AC power for equipment such as some flight instruments and the radar.[31]


Operational history

Javelin FAW 7s of No. 64 Squadron RAF in 1959.
The Javelin entered service with the RAF in 1956 with 46 Squadron based at RAF Odiham, England.[32] The Javelins were immediately put to use in an intensive flying programme in order to build rapid familiarity with the type.[19] The introduction of the Javelin was eased by the establishment of a partial Operational Conversion Unit, a specialised team to assist the members of other squadrons in successfully converting to the type.[33] During RAF trials, the type proved readily capable of intercepting jet bombers such as the English Electric Canberra and modern jet fighters over a hundred miles out to sea.[16][34]
A second squadron, 141, would be equipped with the Javelin in 1957, replacing the squadron's de Havilland Venom aircraft. The introduction of the Javelin allowed the RAF to expand its night fighter activity considerably, taking over night stand-by duty from American forces.[16] By the end of July 1959, all remaining Meteor squadrons had been converted, many having been assigned to operate various models of the Javelin, including the newest FAW.7 variant.[35]
The closest that the RAF's Javelins came to combat was during the Malaysian Confrontation with Indonesia from September 1963 until August 1966. Javelins of 60 Squadron, later joined by 64 Squadron operated out of RAF Tengah, Singapore flying combat patrols over the jungles of Malaysia. In 1964, an Indonesian Air Force Lockheed C-130 Hercules crashed while trying to evade interception by a Javelin FAW.9 of 60 Squadron. During June 1967, following the disbandment of 64 Squadron, 60 Squadron were deployed to RAF Kai Tak, Hong Kong because of unrest in the colony during China's Cultural Revolution. Javelins were also deployed to Zambia during the early stages of Rhodesia's Unilateral Declaration of Independence, to protect Zambia from any action by the Rhodesian Air Force.
The last of the type was withdrawn from service in 1968 with the disbandment of 60 Squadron at RAF Tengah at the end of April 1968.[36] One aircraft remained flying with the Aeroplane and Armament Experimental Establishment at Boscombe Down until 24 January 1975.


Variants

A total of 435 airframes were built by Gloster and Armstrong-Whitworth; both companies at that time were part of the Hawker Siddeley group. Several were converted to different marks (sometimes repeatedly).
FAW 1 - Initial version with Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire Sa.6 engines with 8,000 lbf (35.6 kN thrust) each, British AI.17 radar, four 30 mm ADEN cannon in wings, and electically-operated tail plane;[37] 40 produced, and the seven prototypes were later fitted to this standard.
FAW 2 - Replaced the AI.17 radar with U.S.-made Westinghouse AN/APQ-43 radar (known as the AI-22), hyraudlically-operated tail; 30 produced.[38][37] T 3 Dual-control trainer version with no radar, bulged canopy for improved instructor visibility. All-moving tailplane, lengthened fuselage to compensate for altered centre of gravity, adding additional internal fuel. Retained four cannon; 22 production aircraft and one prototype.[32]
FAW 4 - Similar to FAW 1, with the addition of vortex generators on wings for improved stall characteristics, as well as an all-moving tailplane. Fitted with the original AI.17 radar of the FAW.1. 50 produced.[39][40]
FAW 5 - Based on FAW 4, with revised wing structure incorporating additional fuel tanks, provision for missile pylons (never actually fitted); 64 produced.[37]
FAW 6 - Combined FAW 2's American radar with the revised wing of the FAW.5. 33 produced.[37]
FAW.7 - Introduced new Sa.7 engines with 11,000 lbf (48.9 kN) thrust each, powered rudder, extended rear fuselage. Armed with two 30 mm ADEN plus four Firestreak air-to-air missiles. FAW.7s equipping two squadrons were armed with four ADEN cannon only; 142 produced.
FAW 8 - Upgraded Sa.7R engines with reheat, raising thrust to 12,300 lbf (54.7 kN) thrust above 20,000 ft (6,100 m); at lower altitudes, the limitation of the fuel pump caused a loss of cold thrust.[41] New "drooped" wing leading edge and auto-stabilizer for better handling.
FAW 9 - A total of 118 FAW 7s refitted with the revised wing and engines of the Mk 8., 44 of these were fitted with refuelling probes as FAW 9F/R.
FAW 9R - R standing for "Range". A total of 40 of the 44 FAW 9F/R were refitted to carry underwing fuel tanks.
Several variants were proposed and investigated but not produced, including reconnaissance versions, a fighter bomber version with underwing panniers for bombs, and a supersonic variant with area-ruled fuselage, thinner wings, and a new tail. The "thin wing Javelin" would have been capable of about Mach 1.6 and with a higher ceiling than contemporary US designs. Initial work started with fitting a thinner section wing to a Javelin fuselage but as the project developed the changes became so great that it would effectively have been a different aircraft albeit having an outward resemblance to the Javelin. The final incarnation of the thin wing Javelin just before cancellation was a large aircraft carrying two Red Dean all aspect missiles as a possible contender for Operational Requirement F.155.

[graham22]

Cool - i've wanted to have a look at one of these
looks good on the sprues - look forward to seeing it evolve

[EpoxySniffer]

Thanks for showing us that Lee. The detail looks excellent, another example of the high quality of the new tool Airfix kits.

[Gav0909]

Humina humina humina! Me want! Does this kit not come with crew? I never use them, but its a usual feature of Airfix kits that they come with crew figures.

[Daishi12]

Looking good mate, but how many decals?????

[EasyEight96]

Wow that was fast looking forward to see this bird complete best of luck Lee!!!

[Nige201980]

WOW Lee this is going to be good its a kit that's going on my wish list mate so will be watching this with interest.

[Lysion]

Looking forward to see this come together.

[Johni044]

Where's the jealous smiley when you want it.

One day it will be mine, oh yes, it will be mine

Really looking forward to watching your build, it certainly looks nice.

[Lee]

Review vid....


[youtube]MgU5Z1pm-lA[/youtube]

[fly1ngdutchm4n]

Awesome!
Loved the background story too
Good luck!

[ModelingMatt]

Daddy likes very much indeed

[Lee]

Finished the Vostock tonight so, on with the Javelin

Pit ready for paint.....

[UKscalemodeller]

Don't rush into it will you!

I doubt I'll ever get this but it is a beautiful aircraft.

[BrummieModeller]

Very jealous I want that kit!!

[ModelingMatt]

Kit seats don't look half bad, just add some PE harnesses and they would be even better.

[Lee]

I agree Matt. I may do some Tamiya tape belts just so there's something there....

[Paul]

Looks like a great kit mate, look forward to seeing it come together

[customtk]

Nice
cockpit looks great straight out the box

[Lee]

Haven't had any internet for a few days (Grrrrr BT), so have a few photo's to catch up on. Here goes......


I'm building this in sections so, done the tail first, everything fits great...






Wings all together and wheel bays alcladed.. The wings needed quite a bit of filling and sanding!






As you can see here all those edges inside the lugs had to be carefully scraped out....




Next up was the fuel tanks. BIG disappointment here....
The rear lines up nicely.....



But, the front is way off!




I had two options. Either fill and rescribe, which was going to be a little too hard as the new rescribed line would be right next to the old filled one OR use the spare two top halves of the other set of tanks, fill the gaps and round off. I chose the later.....



Filled the majority of the hole with sprue....







Then filled with squadron white stuff and finished off with some Mr Surfacer 500....






Next up, had a break from filling and sanding and built the service ladder....




Then started work on the cockpit.....

Primed...



Then some colour and dry brushing....








Did the instrument panels and dials, then some dollops of Micro Kristal Klear for the glass effect....






Hopefully I'll get the ejector seats done and the cockpit buttoned up tonight...

Thanks for looking

[Nige201980]

This is looking great mate

[Paul]

Great job mate, cockpits looking good

[Lee]

Cheers fellas

[UKscalemodeller]

good save on the droptanks

[Daimyo]

Nice cockpit I will try dry brushing on my Lancaster cockpit, since its also black. Never did that

[Lee]

Cheers guys....


Instrument panel all finished. Just got to do the seats and the pit is all done...




Did the exhausts today as well. I frickin LOVE Alclad! It's the shizzle..
Don't think the camera has picked up too well the effect I managed, but it looks great in RL

[Rob]

Looking good Lee. It's a pity that the kit has minor issues but you look to have got the better of them.

You obviously like the Alclad. I have never tried these after hearing reports that they are a bit smelly but i have yet to find a metallic i am happy with. Does your AB extractor (I have the same model) do a good job of clearing the cave of the smell of the solvents?

[chief5437]

Looking great Lee! Great work. Just watched your review vid on this kit, looks like Airfix are upping their game. Do you think it's worth the asking price though?

Cheers

[bullgill67]

lovely start Lee

michael

[fly1ngdutchm4n]

Some awesome work on that pit and the exhausts Lee!

[Lee]

Looking good Lee. It's a pity that the kit has minor issues but you look to have got the better of them.

You obviously like the Alclad. I have never tried these after hearing reports that they are a bit smelly but i have yet to find a metallic i am happy with. Does your AB extractor (I have the same model) do a good job of clearing the cave of the smell of the solvents?

Not a whiff Rob - Go for it, you'll never look back. Remember to spray at 10psi though

[Lee]

Looking great Lee! Great work. Just watched your review vid on this kit, looks like Airfix are upping their game. Do you think it's worth the asking price though?

Cheers

In a nutshell - NO!

Far too many things (usual Airfix stuff) wrong with the kit. £35 and the price would be bang on.

Saying that though, I am REALLY enjoying building it. It's given me back my mojo for aircraft

[Rob]

Looking good Lee. It's a pity that the kit has minor issues but you look to have got the better of them.

You obviously like the Alclad. I have never tried these after hearing reports that they are a bit smelly but i have yet to find a metallic i am happy with. Does your AB extractor (I have the same model) do a good job of clearing the cave of the smell of the solvents?

Not a whiff Rob - Go for it, you'll never look back. Remember to spray at 10psi though

Thanks Lee. Go for it I will!

[Paul]

Alclad is awesome stuff, I'm so glad some of you guys are finally getting round to trying it, as far as I'm concerned, nothing comes close the metal finish you can a have with alclad. There's nothing to be worried about using it as long as you follow some guidelines.

Maybe an ism technique video on using it maybe of use

[Rob]

A video on using Alclad? Oh indeed, yes please!

[Paul]

A video on using Alclad? Oh indeed, yes please!

Ok then it's on the to do list

[Lee]

A little more done today and yet MORE disappointment!

Seats all painted....



Then a little wash to dirty them up a bit....



And the cockpit finished (at last!)....











BUT, both sides on and....gap (easy one to sort out though)...!!!





Outer shell on



And...Gap



Gap...



Gap....




Primed the Hellstreaks and coated the ladder ready for chipping...




I've got to say I'm disappointed with this kit so far in as such as the usual Airfix problems are apparent. I am enjoying it though.

It's a real shame that the cockpit doesn't fit properly into the side shells, it's not too much of a problem except where the wheel bay is 'supposed' to meet the fuselage, absolutely nothing I can do about that. I've checked and re-checked to see if it's my fault, but everything is in the correct space at the correct angles etc. I dry fitted the nose cone to make sure and that fits perfectly so, not my fault! It is impossible for the bottom of the wheel well to meet with the fuselage, no way on god's Earth these two will become one!

After this I'm not buying another Airfix kit. For £45 of my hard earned pounds, this is shocking! You certainly wouldn't expect it from a Tamiya, Meng or similar for the same money....

[Paul]

Great job in the cockpit mate,that's a real shame it's not fitting properly.

I highly doubt I'll buy and airfix kit again and I don't have any in my stash. I do like the. 1/48 me109 kit but I've built three now so I'm done on those now.

[Jamesday1998]

Lookin good! The cockpit looks awesome and what are the ultimate modelling washes like?

[Joesdad]

A little more done today and yet MORE disappointment!

Seats all painted....



Then a little wash to dirty them up a bit....



And the cockpit finished (at last!)....











BUT, both sides on and....gap (easy one to sort out though)...!!!





Outer shell on



And...Gap



Gap...



Gap....




Primed the Hellstreaks and coated the ladder ready for chipping...




I've got to say I'm disappointed with this kit so far in as such as the usual Airfix problems are apparent. I am enjoying it though.

It's a real shame that the cockpit doesn't fit properly into the side shells, it's not too much of a problem except where the wheel bay is 'supposed' to meet the fuselage, absolutely nothing I can do about that. I've checked and re-checked to see if it's my fault, but everything is in the correct space at the correct angles etc. I dry fitted the nose cone to make sure and that fits perfectly so, not my fault! It is impossible for the bottom of the wheel well to meet with the fuselage, no way on god's Earth these two will become one!

After this I'm not buying another Airfix kit. For £45 of my hard earned pounds, this is shocking! You certainly wouldn't expect it from a Tamiya, Meng or similar for the same money....

G
That's a massive disappointment Lee. I'm sure we all want Airfix to be right up there, you know, producing really good kits that are value for money, but your Javelin is £50 odd! I've got a problem with them re-boxing old kits in the same packaging as new, which for me is a little naughty...
Doing a cracking job though Lee

[Radzy]

Great Scott, Lee!
What a masterpiece you did with this cockpit! It really looks amazing.
Which paints did you use to paint ejector levers over the seats?
I'm asking because I already tried some yellow paints like Vallejo, Gunze Aqueous and I think Agama's ones, but they seemed to be very poorly covering the paint underneath (even if it was some grey plastic...).

It's a pitty for these gaps in the model... I saw some nice and itneresting Airfix models and such stories (and I already heard a few) make me choose other kit makers' models...

[Lee]

Cheers fellas - It is disappointing and frustrating about Airfix. I REALLY want to like them as I grew up with them and Airfix is synonymous with plastic modelling...

Great Scott, Lee!
What a masterpiece you did with this cockpit! It really looks amazing.
Which paints did you use to paint ejector levers over the seats?
I'm asking because I already tried some yellow paints like Vallejo, Gunze Aqueous and I think Agama's ones, but they seemed to be very poorly covering the paint underneath (even if it was some grey plastic...).

Cheers bud - They were Mr Hobby Aqueous but, had to have 2/3 coats as like the Tamiya they don't brush paint too well. I may, like Paul, try getting rid of my Tamiya collection and trying Lifecolor out...

[EpoxySniffer]

Despite the fit issues you have made a good job on it so far.

There really is no excuse for those gaps is there, especially considering the price of the kit. How on earth do they not ensure the kit fits together when they are developing the product. I thought the whole point of producing test kits and prototypes was to ensure these problems were discovered and rectified before full scale production starts. Maybe they went over budget developing this new tool and rushed it to market before it was ready? Who knows, but its very poor show for the cost of the kit.

A real shame because Airfix are only just starting to gain a good reputation for new tools.

[Lee]

Despite the fit issues you have made a good job on it so far.

There really is no excuse for those gaps is there, especially considering the price of the kit. How on earth do they not ensure the kit fits together when they are developing the product. I thought the whole point of producing test kits and prototypes was to ensure these problems were discovered and rectified before full scale production starts. Maybe they went over budget developing this new tool and rushed it to market before it was ready? Who knows, but its very poor show for the cost of the kit.

A real shame because Airfix are only just starting to gain a good reputation for new tools.

Thanks buddy....

I went over all the steps and looked at all the parts again this morning and I've definitely not done anything wrong or situated the plastic incorrectly! It is a peev for sure.....

[Lee]

Got the lower fuselage together with the wing spars....





Little bit of rescribing to do....




And then more faffing as guess what, the rear panel didn't fit properly so, glue one half, wait half hour then glue other half and clamp....!!!

[chief5437]

Mate, I feel for you! Must be so annoying having those fit issues on a new tool kit. Especially at that price!
You doing some great work on it though, I'm sure it'll be sweet when you've finished with it.

[fly1ngdutchm4n]

ohh Som sweet modelling here Great progress!

[Lee]

Cheers guys - Hoping to get the fuselage, wings and tail on tonight

[Rob]

Nice clamps and nice clamping! It's going to be a corker

[birdbrain39]

which model are you planning to make? It's important as there are errors on all of them - unless artistic licence is more important than accuracy

Clive